ASEAN-Australia-New Zealand Dialogue 2019: Report of proceedings
The 12th AANZ Dialogue was, like its predecessors, hosted by the Institute of Strategic and International Studies (ISIS) Malaysia and brought together an impressive range of senior academic, thinktank, private sector and government specialists.
24 September 2019
About the Dialogue
The 2019 Dialogue focused on the US-China strategic competition, regional trade mechanisms, Preventing/Countering Violent Extremism (P/CVE), environmental challenges, perspectives on ASEAN-centred regional mechanisms/architectures, and the opportunities/challenges for ASEAN-Australia-New Zealand trilateral relations.
The 6 sessions convened were titled:
- Regional perspectives on managing the US-China strategic competition
- Moving forward with regional trade mechanisms
- The challenge of preventing and countering violent extremism on social media
- The challenge of managing the environment in a developing Southeast Asia
- Evaluating regional architectures and mechanisms
- Perspectives on ASEAN-Australia-New Zealand cooperation and challenges
The Dialogue saw strong attendance by participants from various backgrounds, including government officials, academicians, journalists and analysts, among others. A total of 66 participants attended the one-and-a-half-day Dialogue.
Key takeaways from discussions:
- All parties – ASEAN, Australia and New Zealand can learn a lot from each other on engagements with China and the United States, and the issues that drive decision-making in these major powers.
- Participation from the ASEAN Secretariat’s Political Security Department was very valuable to the discussions – especially on ASEAN’s role managing major power relations and in ASEAN centred multilateral mechanisms.
- A greater understanding of how ASEAN, its institutions and Member States operate, especially in areas where there are limitations, were invaluable to stakeholders from Australia and New Zealand.
- ASEAN, Australia and New Zealand, need to move beyond trade cooperation to address political-security and socio-cultural issues – the latter might yield more low-hanging fruits.